A New Parable of the Good Samaritan?

Share

A while ago, I witnessed an exchange between two members of a panel discussion on the ”caravans” of refugees from South America that had once dominated the 24 hour news cycle.

Panelist A described watching a report in which a child fell prostrate from heat exhaustion. For her, she said, it would always be ”humanity first.”

Panelist B retorted, in direct response: ”We are also a nation of laws and borders, which is part of my problem with the way some of this is being spun.”

Both of the panelists identified as Christians. This allegedly means they believe that God is revealed through Jesus Christ. One would assume, therefore, that they 1) believe in God and 2) believe Christ’s teachings to be the Word of God and any commandments he gives to be divine Law. At least, this was my understanding of the faith I grew up in.

Leaving aside the fact that these refugees are repeatedly referred to as ”illegal aliens” when they have as of yet done nothing illegal, and have expressed no intention of doing anything illegal, I had to wonder what sort of ”spin” one might put on human suffering that a professing believer would find problematic.

Is stating, as Panelist A did, that she put humanity first merely ”spin?”

As it happens, there is a lesson from Christ’s ministry that applies directly to this situation. It’s in the book of Luke (chapter 10, starting at verse 25), and in it Christ reveals—in answer to a direct question—the core of his teaching about the salvation of the human soul. Most Bibles label this passage The Parable of the Good Samaritan. I’ve written of it before in different contexts because it is unique in the way Christ uses it to quadruply emphasize what he identifies as God’s primal Law. He does this through

  1. verbally establishing primacy
  2. repetition
  3. illustration, and
  4. direct instruction.

The question Christ answers is pivotal to Christian belief. It is: “What must I do to have eternal life?”

Christ’s answer is to ask the petitioner—a scholar of religious jurisprudence—what is written in Jewish law.

The young lawyer answers: “ ‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your strength, and with all your mind,’ and ‘your neighbor as yourself.’ ”

Christ’s response is direct and clear: ”You have answered correctly. Do this and you shall live.”

With this response, Christ unambiguously links eternal life with what we do with respect to our fellow human beings. In so doing, he establishes the primacy of these two laws originally given by Moses. In other instances, Christ repeats these laws and stresses their primacy yet more by adding, ”On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets.” (Matthew 22:40)

Of all God’s laws, these two take precedence.

But the young legal scholar isn’t satisfied. He asks a second question: “And who is my neighbor?” (Luke indicates he thinks this question is an attempt on the lawyer’s part to justify his own beliefs about this.)

In response, Christ tells the story of a Samaritan who saved the life of a severely wounded Jew when a Jewish priest and a Levite would not. The Samaritan not only takes personal responsibility for this man, despite their religious, ethnic, and cultural antipathy, but he pays someone to care for him by proxy.

At the conclusion of the story, Christ asks the young lawyer: ”So which of these three do you think was neighbor to him who fell among the thieves?”

The answer is obvious: “He who showed mercy on him.”

Christ then puts the finishing touch on his lesson; he gives a second direct commandment: ”Go and do likewise.”

The Parable of the Good Samaritan applies directly to the disagreement between the two Christian panelists over the refugee crisis because it is both a story of humanity and a story of laws and borders.

Laws and borders were why the priest and the Levite refused to help the dying man, though he was a countryman and a fellow Jew. They “passed by on the other side” of the road out of a fear of crossing boundaries of ritual purity imposed on them by Jewish law.

The Samaritan was also bound by laws and borders—specifically, borders between Jew and Samaritan that were ancient, abiding, and rooted in theological differences. His religious leaders had set strict boundaries between Samaritans and their despised neighbors, the Jews, whom they regarded as heretical, apostate, unclean. They were not to cross through Jewish territory, nor consort with Jews in any way.

The hatred was mutual; to the Jews, the Samaritans were heretical ”dogs”—vermin who pilfered scraps from the table of their betters.

Unlike the two Jews in Christ’s scenario, the Samaritan acted on God’s word that love of his neighbor was a primal commandment. The Samaritan’s act was not one of defiance, but a recognition that God’s commandment to put humanity first took precedence over any other laws.

One more observation about that dual law: By binding the commandment to love Him and love one’s neighbor together, God put love for our fellow human beings on a par with love for Him. The two laws are inseparable. He also makes eternal life dependent on the observance of this law.

So, this is the context of the disagreement between the two panelists. Panelist A advocated for the behavior of the Samaritan in Christ’s illustration, which Christ unequivocally endorsed when he said, ”Go and do likewise.” Panelist B endorsed the behavior of the Levite and the priest. In her version of the parable, the two co-religionists of the dying man were in the right, practicing a higher virtue by upholding their laws and borders over God’s command to put humanity first.

As I read and prayerfully meditate on Christ’s lesson in Luke, I must ask if he is not demanding more of us: That we see ourselves as a people obedient to the Law upon which all others depend—to put humanity first.

O Children of Men! Know ye not why We created you all from the same dust? That no one should exalt himself over the other. Ponder at all times in your hearts how ye were created. Since We have created you all from one same substance it is incumbent on you to be even as one soul, to walk with the same feet, eat with the same mouth and dwell in the same land, that from your inmost being, by your deeds and actions, the signs of oneness and the essence of detachment may be made manifest. Such is My counsel to you, O concourse of light! Heed ye this counsel that ye may obtain the fruit of holiness from the tree of wondrous glory. —  The Hidden Words of Bahá’u’lláh, Arabic vs. 68

Our Most Challenging Issue – Four

Share

This is the fourth in a series of essays that use, as their centerpiece, the statement on race unity released some years ago by the National Spiritual Assembly of the Baha’is of the United States: The Vision of Race Unity: America’s Most Challenging Issue. The quoted segment below is Part II of the statement, and its primary focus is applying the spiritual principle of the oneness of humanity to the individual and collective life of the nation.

Buddha famously said, “It is indeed a fact that salvation cannot come from the mere sight of Me. It demands strenuous efforts in the practice of Dharma (Truth). But if someone has understood this my Dharma, then he is released from the net of suffering, even though he never set eyes on Me. A man must take medicine to be cured; the mere sight of the physician is not enough.” — Buddhacarita XXV 33:4

This is what every Teacher/ Prophet/ Manifestation of God has taught. You have to walk the walk, not just talk the talk.

Christ also enunciates this clearly: “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’” Matthew 7:21-23

There are a number of passages in the Baha’i Scriptures that speak to this idea that principle must be applied if it is to have an effect in the material world. The following passage was written by the Founder of the Faith, Baha’u’llah, in the latter half of the 19th century.

“It is incumbent upon every man of insight and understanding to strive to translate that which hath been written into reality and action…. That one indeed is a man who, today, dedicateth himself to the service of the entire human race. The Great Being saith: Blessed and happy is he that ariseth to promote the best interests of the peoples and kindreds of the earth. In another passage He hath proclaimed: It is not for him to pride himself who loveth his own country, but rather for him who loveth the whole world. The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens.” — Baha’u’llah, Proclamation of Baha’u’llah, p 116

The principles enunciated by the various Teachers that God has sent to guide us require knowledge, volition, and action if they are to have an effect in the material world. These Teachers do not say ”believe this and you shall live”, but ”DO this and you shall live.”

These are deceptively simple principles that can be very hard to follow, especially with people we think of as different in some essential way. But it is only through the application of these principles that we progress as a species.

When Christ said “DO this and you shall live”, He was referring to rendering loving service even to those we feel we have every reason to despise (in the case of the Jew and the Samaritan, because they were of different tribal and religious groups).

The National Spiritual Assembly, in its statement, focuses on the application of Baha’u’llah’s spiritual principle of the oneness of humanity and its implications for the necessity to eliminate racial prejudice from our individual and collective lives.

oOo

“The application of the spiritual principle of the oneness of humanity to the life of the nation would necessitate and make possible vast changes in the economic status of the non-white segments of the population. Although poverty afflicts members of all races, its victims tend to be largely people of color. Prejudice and discrimination have created a disparity in standards of living, providing some with excessive economic advantage while denying others the bare necessities for leading healthy and dignified lives. Poor housing, deficient diet, inadequate health care, insufficient education are consequences of poverty that afflict African Americans, American Indians, and Hispanic Americans more than they afflict the rest of the population. The cost to society at large is heavy.

“Evidence of the negative effect of racial and ethnic conflict on the economy has prompted a number of businesses and corporations to institute educational programs that teach conflict resolution and are designed to eliminate racial and ethnic tensions from the workplace. These are important steps and should be encouraged. If, however, they are intended primarily to save the economy, no enduring solution will be found to the disastrous consequences of racism. For it cannot suffice to offer academic education and jobs to people while at the same time shutting them out because of racial prejudice from normal social intercourse based on brotherly love and mutual respect. The fundamental solution—the one that will reduce violence, regenerate and focus the intellectual and moral energy of minorities, and make them partners in the construction of a progressive society—rests ultimately on the common recognition of the oneness of humankind.

“It is entirely human to fail if that which is most important to people’s self-perception is denied them—namely, the dignity they derive from a genuine regard by others for their stature as human beings. No educational, economic, or political plan can take the place of this essential human need; it is not a need that businesses and schools, or even governments, can provide in isolation from the supportive attitude of society as a whole. Such an attitude needs to be grounded in a spiritual and moral truth that all acknowledge and accept as their own and that, like the oxygen that serves all equally, breathes life into their common effort to live in unity and peace. Absence of the genuine regard for others fostered by such truth causes hopelessness in those discriminated against; and in a state of hopelessness, people lose the coherent moral powers to realize their potential. This vitalizing truth, we are convinced, is summarized in the phrase: the oneness of humankind.

“So essential is the principle of the oneness of humanity to the efficacy of educational programs that it cannot be overemphasized. Without its broad influence such programs will not contribute significantly to the development of society. The very fact that businesses are themselves implementing educational programs is indicative of the glaring deficiency of the entire educational system. As we have already said, beyond the mechanisms of education lies the essential prerequisite of a proper attitude on the part of those dispensing curricula and, even more important, on the part of society as a whole. On this basis, education is not only the shortest route out of poverty; it is the shortest route out of prejudice as well. A national program of education, emphasizing the values of tolerance, brotherhood, appreciation for cultures other than one’s own, and respect for differences would be a most important step toward the elimination of racism and, as a consequence, the bolstering of the economy.” (Emphasis mine) — The Vision of Race Unity, Part II

oOo

fullsizeoutput_c03The message seems clear: as long as education does not consider human virtues such as tolerance, kindness, rationality, and genuine knowledge of and appreciation for others as necessary to our society and to our survival as a species, we will not learn these things and our society will always be torn by needless, futile schism. The world we claim we want—a peaceful, prosperous world in which our children do not need to claw their way to some imaginary top—will remain forever beyond our grasp.

The choice is ours. We make it day by day and minute by minute when we act—or fail to act—upon those principles we profess to believe. Principles enshrined in the scriptures of our various faiths, the founding documents of our nation and the words of our national leaders.

“The attainment of any object is conditioned upon knowledge, volition and action. Unless these three conditions are forthcoming there is no execution or accomplishment. In the erection of a house it is first necessary to know the ground and design the house suitable for it; second, to obtain the means or funds necessary for the construction; third, to actually build it.” — Abdu’l-Bahá, Foundations of World Unity, p 101

Today’s Daily Reading: Abdu’l-Bahá Does it Again

Share

light BibleToday, as it often does, my daily reading bore on a real conversation I’ve been having. In this case, with a group of people who are, shall we say, not kindly disposed to Islam, on Brietbart.

The quoted material is from a talk Abdu’l-Bahá gave during his visit to the United States in 1912.

I shall ask you a question: Did God create us for love or for enmity? Did He create us for peace or discord? Surely He has created us for love; therefore, we should live in accordance with His will. Do not listen to anything that is prejudiced, for self-interest prompts men to be prejudiced. They are thoughtful only of their own will and purposes. They live and move in darkness. Consider how many different nations and divergent religious beliefs existed when Christ appeared. Enmity and strife prevailed among them—Romans, Greeks, Assyrians, Egyptians—all warring and hostile toward each other. Christ, through the breaths of the Holy Spirit, united them, established fellowship among them so that no trace of strife remained. Under His standard they became united and lived in peace through His teachings. Which is preferable and more commendable? To follow the example of Jesus Christ or to manifest the satanic instinct? Let us strive with all our powers to unite the East and West so that the nations of the world may be advanced and that all may live according to the one foundation of the religions of God. The essentials of the divine religion are one reality, indivisible and not multiple. It is one. And when through investigation we find it to be single, we have a basis for the oneness of the world of humanity. I will pray for you, asking confirmation and assistance in your behalf.

— `Abdu’l-Bahá, Promulgation of Universal Peace, p437

Borders Part 1: Suffer the Little Children

Share

140717074651-newday-dnt-kosinski-border-crisis-politics-00014206-story-topGo to any article, news story or blog discussing the immigration issue and/or the current refugee crisis on our southern border (they’re often conflated), and you will find phrases like the ones below. These are real comments pulled verbatim from comment threads, from blogs and from interviews contained in the news stories about immigration and the current border crisis.

“We need to make illegals uncomfortable…”

“We need to stop the infestation…”

“We need to stop this plague…”

“If we can’t secure our borders, we can’t protect our country…”

“IF IT IS BETWEEN OUR CITIZENS AND FOREIGN INVADING KIDS, MY COMPASSION IS NOT FOR THE INVADERS.”

“…the state of Texas would appear to have the right, not only to use whatever means, whether it’s troops, even using ships of war, even exacting a tax on interstate commerce that wouldn’t normally be allowed to have or utilize, they’d be entitled in order to pay to stop the invasion.” 

That last one stands out because it was from an elected official—a Congressman—who ostensibly has the authority to make laws. Given that the “invaders” are children and mothers, what does the Congressman propose that the troops and warships do? Shoot women and children? Shoot just the few men with them in the hope that they’ll go home in despair? I had to wonder if he would be willing, himself, to pick up a gun and demonstrate how he would keep the tide of refugees out of America by force. He’s a professing Christian, so I also wondered if he’d be willing to demonstrate this before the eyes of Christ and God.

jesus-with-children-jesus-33864297-500-375This would certainly put a different spin on Jesus Christ’s words: “Suffer the little children to come unto Me.” Continue reading